Advertisement
Somethings are not what they seem to be....
I believe darkness and evil are an illusion. :-) (thru my own understanding...) These are not part of our holographic nature.
Darkness is not measuable without light. You cannot soley measure just pure darkness, if indeed it even exists? Darkness is all the light waves absorbed at once right? So in truth Darkness is "our" retinal expereince of light waves resounding in very low frequencies.
If "black" absorbs all the visible wavelengths, then there is no real color such as black, since "black" or "darkness" is ALL the spectral wavelengths absorbed into one. Black is just a sensation of all the colors(wavelengths)together? In fact it is how our human retina that percieves this phenomenon. Could be different thru the 'eye' of a lizard yes? Everything is light waves, even darkness, so how can darkness be a concrete reality?
Present theories of perception suggest that blackness is caused by the lateral inhibitory influences of retinal neurons, in short, an optical illusion. Neuroscientist's present theory of blackness is called "lateral inhibitory interaction" and it is not really consistent with the physics idea of the absence of light.
The darkness and blackness are proposed to be a cosmic particle background of low energy photons. The frequency of darkness radiation is proposed to be at "one hertz and below", thus darkness quanta lie on a distinct band on the electromagnetic spectrum. Darkness and blackness are unified by having the same external (objective) cause, this being the cosmic long-wavelength photon background. It is argued that if darkness and blackness are considered an objective stimulus to the visual system, it explains why photoreceptor cells turn off when visible photons are absorbed. These long-wavelength electromagnetic photons are proposed to interact with the visual system by aiding in the production and raising levels of cGMP in photoreceptor membranes. It is proposed that the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) may be the site of absorption of cosmic long-wavelength quanta. Both physical and biological evidence is given to support the model in which long-wavelength quanta provide a stimulus to retinal cells. It is argued that existing color theories can be made more consistent by considering cosmic long-wavelength photons as the objective source for darkness and blackness. The preponderance of brain activity in the dark, which is not explained in present theories, is consistent with the new darkness and blackness model. It is proposed that the retinal system of receptors are in harmonic resonance with vibrating electromagnetic fields at one hertz and below, yielding the perceptual experience of blackness.
"Yielding the perceptual experience of blackness." Just an experience, not a concrete reality. Darkness, being a cosmic long wave photon backround, would be more apropriate to say it is, in reality, "light".
Indeed, most scientists believe that the absence of light is a valid hypothesis. However, these same scientists commonly speak about blackness as if it were identical to an actual color experience, like there really is something of substance present.
Darkness can still be considered the absence of visible light, but not the absence of all electromagnetic radiation. If the darkness and blackness are fundamentally electromagnetic particles, the darkness and blackness has physical substance in the same way as photons at all other wavelengths do. In this new model, called the long-wavelength photon model, the darkness is a cosmic background of ordinary electromagnetic photons at very long wavelengths.
From the organization of receptive fields, dark currents in rod photoreceptors, theories of color vision and even in everyday language, all the evidence points to blackness being a pronounced perceptual and physiological phenomena. The key questions arising from this research are: Is there a physical stimulus behind the perceptions of darkness and blackness? Is the darkness and blackness created externally or are they internal subjective optical illusions? What is the relationship between electromagnetic photons and the visual system? What molecular mechanisms are responsible for the absorption of weak long-wavelength photons and where in the visual system are such quanta absorbed? Does the way in which photoreceptors function demonstrate new physical laws concerning the nature of light and darkness?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is it safe to say that the object (say a green one) is rejecting that certain wavelength which resonates as green, of its body/particular matter, and thus is the reason our eyes see that wavelength known as green? If so, then is it not right to say that the object is everything but the color green? We see green, because that is what is being rejected (reflected) off of the particular object in question. Right?
Color originates in light. Sunlight, as we perceive it, is colorless. In reality, a rainbow is testimony to the fact that all the colors of the spectrum are present in white light.
Lets look at the color red. All the" invisible" colors of sunlight shine on the apple. The surface of a red apple absorbs all the colored light rays, EXCEPT for those corresponding to red, and reflects this color to the human eye. The eye receives the reflected red light and sends a message to the brain.
"Color is the visual effect that is caused by the spectral composition of the light emitted, transmitted, or reflected by objects."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is safe to say that all of the Universe operates on some type of harmonic system. If it were not so, planets would be bumping into eachother all over the universe.
In my understanding of darkness & evil, I can safely conclude that according to Law of physics and the Universe (God) darkness & evil are illusions.
Darkness and evil are sensations created by our mind/brain. How we percieve darkness and evil are our own interpretations of our expereince in reaction to light-wave frequencies compiled into what we call reality or our existence in this world.
To a tree, all of the drama that is going on is just that: drama. There is no attached emotional interpretation of the particular drama being evil, darkness or otherwise. A tree reacts by and thru the forces of Nature - the Universal Law. When it gets cut, fed poisons etc... it does not react and say: THIS IS EVIL. It reacts by and thru the laws of physics governing the natural organic compounds of its existence. It may die, it may not. Its leaves whither due to the poisons, and its body goes into shock when it is cut down... but in its whole experience EVIL is not present. Its natural growth does stir and move to re-align into the "HARMONIC" process of its Nature. We see this Nature and harmony as good. Of course. It is LIFE! When we see a tree being cut down, we either see it as evil, sad, good, money, a house etc... WE place the value and lable according to 'our own' experience. But in the reality of the Universe, its either dis-harmonic or harmonic. The natural LAW of the Univere is based on harmony. Anything that is not in harmony eventually resolves to re-align back into its intricate web of harmonic band waves of light. Anything that is not in 'harmony' is not nessassarily 'evil' either... its existence will either move back into a harmonic resonance or dissolve into somethign else to be aligned by the order of Life/Creation.
The Universe is Light. Light is wave form. Light is love. A wave form is sound... so it is a most intriging thing to say that in the beggining was the Word. God is love. Dogmatic religion is like a dis-harmonic poison. Most base their teachings on false doctrine and fear. God is not a MAN nor a WOMAN but an energetic state of consciousness of all that is harmonic, of ALL THAT IS, of Life. The greater I AM. The Universe in action creating us, we, them, stars, planets, photon bands, nebulae etc... All is Light. All is sound. All is Numbered. All is holo-graphic. We are an amazing creation spun thru the intricacy of star fusion and fission, being sung by the very voice of Light.
(((((aum)))))
:-)
peace
xo
lana
I believe darkness and evil are an illusion. :-) (thru my own understanding...) These are not part of our holographic nature.
Darkness is not measuable without light. You cannot soley measure just pure darkness, if indeed it even exists? Darkness is all the light waves absorbed at once right? So in truth Darkness is "our" retinal expereince of light waves resounding in very low frequencies.
If "black" absorbs all the visible wavelengths, then there is no real color such as black, since "black" or "darkness" is ALL the spectral wavelengths absorbed into one. Black is just a sensation of all the colors(wavelengths)together? In fact it is how our human retina that percieves this phenomenon. Could be different thru the 'eye' of a lizard yes? Everything is light waves, even darkness, so how can darkness be a concrete reality?
Present theories of perception suggest that blackness is caused by the lateral inhibitory influences of retinal neurons, in short, an optical illusion. Neuroscientist's present theory of blackness is called "lateral inhibitory interaction" and it is not really consistent with the physics idea of the absence of light.
The darkness and blackness are proposed to be a cosmic particle background of low energy photons. The frequency of darkness radiation is proposed to be at "one hertz and below", thus darkness quanta lie on a distinct band on the electromagnetic spectrum. Darkness and blackness are unified by having the same external (objective) cause, this being the cosmic long-wavelength photon background. It is argued that if darkness and blackness are considered an objective stimulus to the visual system, it explains why photoreceptor cells turn off when visible photons are absorbed. These long-wavelength electromagnetic photons are proposed to interact with the visual system by aiding in the production and raising levels of cGMP in photoreceptor membranes. It is proposed that the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) may be the site of absorption of cosmic long-wavelength quanta. Both physical and biological evidence is given to support the model in which long-wavelength quanta provide a stimulus to retinal cells. It is argued that existing color theories can be made more consistent by considering cosmic long-wavelength photons as the objective source for darkness and blackness. The preponderance of brain activity in the dark, which is not explained in present theories, is consistent with the new darkness and blackness model. It is proposed that the retinal system of receptors are in harmonic resonance with vibrating electromagnetic fields at one hertz and below, yielding the perceptual experience of blackness.
"Yielding the perceptual experience of blackness." Just an experience, not a concrete reality. Darkness, being a cosmic long wave photon backround, would be more apropriate to say it is, in reality, "light".
Indeed, most scientists believe that the absence of light is a valid hypothesis. However, these same scientists commonly speak about blackness as if it were identical to an actual color experience, like there really is something of substance present.
Darkness can still be considered the absence of visible light, but not the absence of all electromagnetic radiation. If the darkness and blackness are fundamentally electromagnetic particles, the darkness and blackness has physical substance in the same way as photons at all other wavelengths do. In this new model, called the long-wavelength photon model, the darkness is a cosmic background of ordinary electromagnetic photons at very long wavelengths.
From the organization of receptive fields, dark currents in rod photoreceptors, theories of color vision and even in everyday language, all the evidence points to blackness being a pronounced perceptual and physiological phenomena. The key questions arising from this research are: Is there a physical stimulus behind the perceptions of darkness and blackness? Is the darkness and blackness created externally or are they internal subjective optical illusions? What is the relationship between electromagnetic photons and the visual system? What molecular mechanisms are responsible for the absorption of weak long-wavelength photons and where in the visual system are such quanta absorbed? Does the way in which photoreceptors function demonstrate new physical laws concerning the nature of light and darkness?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is it safe to say that the object (say a green one) is rejecting that certain wavelength which resonates as green, of its body/particular matter, and thus is the reason our eyes see that wavelength known as green? If so, then is it not right to say that the object is everything but the color green? We see green, because that is what is being rejected (reflected) off of the particular object in question. Right?
Color originates in light. Sunlight, as we perceive it, is colorless. In reality, a rainbow is testimony to the fact that all the colors of the spectrum are present in white light.
Lets look at the color red. All the" invisible" colors of sunlight shine on the apple. The surface of a red apple absorbs all the colored light rays, EXCEPT for those corresponding to red, and reflects this color to the human eye. The eye receives the reflected red light and sends a message to the brain.
"Color is the visual effect that is caused by the spectral composition of the light emitted, transmitted, or reflected by objects."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is safe to say that all of the Universe operates on some type of harmonic system. If it were not so, planets would be bumping into eachother all over the universe.
In my understanding of darkness & evil, I can safely conclude that according to Law of physics and the Universe (God) darkness & evil are illusions.
Darkness and evil are sensations created by our mind/brain. How we percieve darkness and evil are our own interpretations of our expereince in reaction to light-wave frequencies compiled into what we call reality or our existence in this world.
To a tree, all of the drama that is going on is just that: drama. There is no attached emotional interpretation of the particular drama being evil, darkness or otherwise. A tree reacts by and thru the forces of Nature - the Universal Law. When it gets cut, fed poisons etc... it does not react and say: THIS IS EVIL. It reacts by and thru the laws of physics governing the natural organic compounds of its existence. It may die, it may not. Its leaves whither due to the poisons, and its body goes into shock when it is cut down... but in its whole experience EVIL is not present. Its natural growth does stir and move to re-align into the "HARMONIC" process of its Nature. We see this Nature and harmony as good. Of course. It is LIFE! When we see a tree being cut down, we either see it as evil, sad, good, money, a house etc... WE place the value and lable according to 'our own' experience. But in the reality of the Universe, its either dis-harmonic or harmonic. The natural LAW of the Univere is based on harmony. Anything that is not in harmony eventually resolves to re-align back into its intricate web of harmonic band waves of light. Anything that is not in 'harmony' is not nessassarily 'evil' either... its existence will either move back into a harmonic resonance or dissolve into somethign else to be aligned by the order of Life/Creation.
The Universe is Light. Light is wave form. Light is love. A wave form is sound... so it is a most intriging thing to say that in the beggining was the Word. God is love. Dogmatic religion is like a dis-harmonic poison. Most base their teachings on false doctrine and fear. God is not a MAN nor a WOMAN but an energetic state of consciousness of all that is harmonic, of ALL THAT IS, of Life. The greater I AM. The Universe in action creating us, we, them, stars, planets, photon bands, nebulae etc... All is Light. All is sound. All is Numbered. All is holo-graphic. We are an amazing creation spun thru the intricacy of star fusion and fission, being sung by the very voice of Light.
(((((aum)))))
:-)
peace
xo
lana
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Darkness - is an illusion
Fri, September 17, 2004 - 3:11 PMDarkness and Boredom as entropic mass "aspects", for me have been gateways to pass through into an expanded reality; not unlike "stop" signs on the road, only this entropic sign says... "get ready for more".
Michael -
-
Unsu...
Re: Darkness - is an illusion
Fri, September 17, 2004 - 3:34 PMhehe...yes. What IS boredom?
xo
lana
-
-
Re: Darkness - is an illusion
Mon, September 20, 2004 - 3:20 PMalthough...one could make an arguement about Dark Matter. Though I'm hardly qualified. And anti-matter exists just as much as matter. So can light exist without darkness? Matter can not exist witout anti-matter. Yin and Yang are inseperable. Food for thought. If they're are any sub-atomic or quantum phycisists out there perhaps they could comment... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Darkness - is an illusion
Mon, September 20, 2004 - 4:58 PMYes I see your point about yin/yang... that is so true. To our limited understanding. It is also true that our perception is very limited due to our retinal system.
I wonder about Yin and Yang.... at the ceneter of each and all the molecules, ether, star systems (fusion & fission) at the very center of the tiniest invisible particle in yin and yang... light is.
Present theories of perception suggest that blackness is caused by the lateral inhibitory influences of retinal neurons, in short, an optical illusion. Neuroscientist's present theory of blackness is called "lateral inhibitory interaction" and it is not really consistent with the physics idea of the absence of light.
The darkness and blackness are proposed to be a cosmic particle background of low energy photons. The frequency of darkness radiation is proposed to be at "one hertz and below", thus darkness quanta lie on a distinct band on the electromagnetic spectrum. Darkness and blackness are unified by having the same external (objective) cause, this being the cosmic long-wavelength photon background. It is argued that if darkness and blackness are considered an objective stimulus to the visual system, it explains why photoreceptor cells turn off when visible photons are absorbed. These long-wavelength electromagnetic photons are proposed to interact with the visual system by aiding in the production and raising levels of cGMP in photoreceptor membranes. It is proposed that the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) may be the site of absorption of cosmic long-wavelength quanta. Both physical and biological evidence is given to support the model in which long-wavelength quanta provide a stimulus to retinal cells. It is argued that existing color theories can be made more consistent by considering cosmic long-wavelength photons as the objective source for darkness and blackness. The preponderance of brain activity in the dark, which is not explained in present theories, is consistent with the new darkness and blackness model. It is proposed that the retinal system of receptors are in harmonic resonance with vibrating electromagnetic fields at one hertz and below, yielding the perceptual experience of blackness.
"Yielding the perceptual experience of blackness." Just an experience, not a concrete reality. Darkness, being a cosmic long wave photon backround, would be more apropriate to say it is, in reality, "light".
Indeed, most scientists believe that the absence of light is a valid hypothesis. However, these same scientists commonly speak about blackness as if it were identical to an actual color experience, like there really is something of substance present.
Darkness can still be considered the absence of visible light, but not the absence of all electromagnetic radiation. If the darkness and blackness are fundamentally electromagnetic particles, the darkness and blackness has physical substance in the same way as photons at all other wavelengths do. In this new model, called the long-wavelength photon model, the darkness is a cosmic background of ordinary electromagnetic photons at very long wavelengths.
From the organization of receptive fields, dark currents in rod photoreceptors, theories of color vision and even in everyday language, all the evidence points to blackness being a pronounced perceptual and physiological phenomena. The key questions arising from this research are:
Is there a physical stimulus behind the perceptions of darkness and blackness?
Is the darkness and blackness created externally or are they internal subjective optical illusions?
What is the relationship between electromagnetic photons and the visual system?
What molecular mechanisms are responsible for the absorption of weak long-wavelength photons and where in the visual system are such quanta absorbed?
Does the way in which photoreceptors function demonstrate new physical laws concerning the nature of light and darkness?
-
